Synopsis/blurb…..
Nameless is called in
by his friend, police lieutenant Eberhardt, when a dead woman's purse contains
Nameless's business card. Nameless has never met her, and cannot make a
connection. Next, Nameless is hired to track and protect a disturbed man,
Martin Talbot, who may be harmed by the husband of a woman who died when
Talbot's car collided with theirs after Talbot fell asleep at the wheel.
Labyrinth is the
6th episode in the Nameless series and the first one I’ve read since
2013.
Nameless is involved in a couple of cases here; one of which
he is getting paid for – to keep an eye on his employer’s brother and the other
which involves a dead woman – unknown to him – but who was found shot dead and
carrying his business card.
Martin Talbot was involved in a road traffic accident, which
resulted in the death of Victor Carding’s wife. Carding has threatened Talbot
and Talbot - a moral and principled man and suffering from guilt and PTSD over
the accident feels he should be punished and that his own death would be just. Rich
sister, Laura Nichols wishes to avoid such an occurrence, as much for the
damage to the family name in the well-to-do community as for any sense of
sibling loyalty. She engages Nameless to protect him.
Nameless - broke again, takes the case, despite his initial
dislike of Mrs Nichols and her rather sniffy attitude to “common people.” What
is it about certain rich people that they are imbued with a sense of entitlement?
Nameless follows Talbot to Carding’s house and one of the pair
winds up dead. During the course of subsequent enquiries he discovers that
Carding’s son, who was working up the coast has gone missing. Somewhat spookily,
the son is also the boyfriend of Christine Webster – Webster being our dead
woman, who we encounter at the start of our book.
Do we have a mystery with a series of unlikely coincidences
with our two cases connected by common personalities, but separated by motive? Yes,
but not really as Pronzini makes you believe in the tale with his plotting
skills and well-reasoned narrative.
A trip up the coast, some gentle questioning, a bit of
head-scratching, a bit of suspicion, some more digging, a few dots connected, a
bit of late night burglary and an involuntary midnight swim in the Pacific. We
get some answers.
It’s difficult to articulate just what it is I like so much
about these mysteries.
A sense of place; certainly - with the ones enjoyed thus far,
set mainly in and around San Francisco and the surrounding coastal areas. The mysteries
themselves, with Nameless usually solving the puzzle, often times in
collaboration or with the involvement of the police are only a fraction of the
whole. There’s not an over-reliance on action to drive the book forward,
sometimes our pace can be somewhat sedate, but that works.
I think the standout feature of the books is the main man
himself. Nameless is single – not through choice and has few friends – mainly police
officers that we meet during the course of his adventures. He has had health
issues – Labyrinth finds him off the cigarettes for 18 months, after being
diagnosed with a lesion on the lung in our previous encounter. There’s an
inherent decency about him that makes him endearing. Stoic, lonely, aging,
mortal……. I can’t help but wish him good health and happiness as I continue to
work my way through this series.
5 from 5
Roll on August when I will be reading the seventh in the series
– 1981’s Hoodwink.
I bought my copy second hand in the past 3 years or so.
Sadly it’s not the signed copy depicted – that’s a web image I found. It is the
same edition and I’m not the first person to enjoy it either. My copy – much read
in a previous life - entertained members of the East Cleveland Public Library
back in the 80s. The note on the inside flap of the book – published 1980 –
describes Pronzini as a “veteran mystery writer.” Thirty five years on, the author’s
creative juices are still flowing strong – Vixen the 40th instalment
in the series was published earlier this year.
A score of 5 from you always makes me sit up. I have enjoyed a couple of Pronzinis, including one you sent me, but I just can't start on another series!
ReplyDeletePS - you didn't get up into the loft this week then...?
DeleteWell it is only a mere 40 books long plus a couple of short story collections - not too challenging!
DeleteHmm - suffering a big of blogger fatigue TBH. Not been around all my usual haunts and definitely been posting less. I'm undecided whether to continue airing the library on the blog and carry on doing my usual round-ups and 2 BY posts, or whether to just put up a few thoughts on the books I have read.
DeleteI did have the next tub logged and added to my spreadsheet (and the next 7 after that have been photographed) - I just didn't have any enthusiasm for constructing the post and adding all the happy snaps. I may continue the exercise off-line.
I've always liked Nameless a lot too, Col. He is a decent, moral person, 'though he's also human. And he's had his share of troubles, but doesn't drown himself in booze. I can't help but wish him well, too. I think you make a good point about the setting of these stories too; Pronzini does a great job of evoking the San Francisco area.
ReplyDeleteYou're right he's exactly that, though in this one he has a rush of blood and commits a burglary - which kind of surprised me. He's at times - short, impatient and a bit grumpy with his neighbour. I liked the way the story was presented as we had an inner monologue from Nameless throughout.
DeleteI almost miss San Francisco's fog when I'm not reading about it!
This sounds like a good one, thanks.
ReplyDeleteElgin, I have to admit I'm a big fan of this series.
DeleteGreat review, Col. I think you are right about Nameless being the main attraction. And it only gets better. At least up through the first 20 that I have read. I don't have a problem with that because I can barely do two posts a week, generally. Especially with work being such a bear right now.
ReplyDeleteTracy thanks. I'm glad I decided to get back into these - hopefully I will stick with him until the end!
DeleteHope work improves, mine isn't brilliant at the minute, but it tends to be cyclical - hopefully it improves for you soon!
Great writeup, Col. It sounds like a fun entry in the series. I confess I've read only a couple of the Nameless books, so this sentence --
ReplyDeleteVixen the 40th instalment in the series was published earlier this year.
strikes a bit of a chill! No way am I ever going to catch up.
I see from your sidebar that we've both been reading Jonathan Craig more or less simultaneously. I finished his Red-Headed Sinners a couple of days ago.
John thanks. I reckon you could get to all 40 but you might need to cut down on Gutenburg site visits! (I harbour delusions of reading my way through the 87th Precinct books also - that's 50-plus!)
DeleteJunkie was a recommendation from you, which fills the gap I missed in Rich's Past Offences Crime meme - albeit 11-12 months late!
I've been meaning to try this writer. Which one do you recommend I start with?
ReplyDeleteKeishon from the few I have read, I'd say either THE SNATCH or THE VANISHED maybe. There are plenty of standalone books as well - BLUE LONESOME is quite well regarded I think.
DeleteKeishon - if you do give him a go, I hope you enjoy the book and his writing. I always feel slightly nervous, when giving people recommendations!
DeleteWhat a neat copy of the book what with the library check outs included. And glad you enjoyed it.
ReplyDeleteGlen cheers - the next one is a mass market paperback - it doesn't have quite the same history I think!
DeleteCol, I'm absolutely curious about the Nameless series and I'll be making it a point to read a couple of them before the end of the year.
ReplyDeletePrashant, I look forward to seeing what you think.
Delete