Pages

Pages

Thursday, 24 September 2015

PIERRE BOILEAU AND THOMAS NARCEJAC - VERTIGO (1954)


Synopsis/blurb……..

"Do you think it's possible to live again, Monsieur? ... I mean ... is it possible to die and then ... live again in someone else?"

You're no longer in the police, but when an old friend asks you to look after his wife as a favour, how can you refuse? She's been behaving strangely, mysteriously - but she's dazzling. And so Flavières begins to scour the streets of Paris in search of an answer - in search of a woman who belongs to no one, not even to herself. Soon intrigue is replaced by obsession, and dreams by nightmares, as the boundaries between the living and the dead begin to blur.
This is the story of a desperate man. A man who ended up compromising his own morality beyond all measure, while the Second World War raged outside his front door. A man tormented by his search for the truth, and ultimately destroyed by a dark, terrible secret.

A bit of classic crime fiction with French double act Boileau and Narcejac’s 1954 book Vertigo – the basis for Hitchcock’s classic film.
Co-authors and film-maker.

Set in war-time Paris, former detective Flavieres is asked by an old friend Gevigne to keep an eye on his wife. Something appears to be troubling Madeleine but her husband can’t put his finger on it.
Flavieres, a lawyer and a loner agrees and very soon becomes obsessed with Madeleine. Madeleine behaves strangely, visiting a graveyard, renting a hotel room for afternoon visits, penning letters but ripping them into pieces before attempting to drown herself. Flavieres rescues her and as a consequence his relationship with her becomes more intimate (not in a physical sense).

She is convinced that she has lived before, as one of her ancestors – Pauline Lagerlac - her great grandmother who committed suicide. The Paris narrative ends with the death of Madeleine falling from a high church tower in a town away from the capital. Flavieres again, overcome by vertigo is impotent and unable to prevent her sudden actions.

At this point in reading, I realised I had seen the film albeit some years previously. Long enough ago to have forgotten the outcome anyway.

The second part of our book, picks up four years later in Marseilles. Flavieres is still alone, his life revolving around his next drink. A chance viewing of a newsreel clip featuring DeGaulle in Marseilles and Flavieres believes he catches a glimpse of Madeleine as the camera pans the crowd.

His obsession reawakens.

Fantastic book, complex, convoluted plot but plausible enough or at least not too fanciful to require a suspension of belief. Flavieres is interesting as our protagonist; he’s neither loathsome or sympathetic, which is a clever portrayal and balancing act. Did I care about him and his outcome? Probably not, I was more interested in getting to the bottom of the book.   

Great read

4.5 out of 5.

I’m tempted to re-watch the film soon. Vertigo the movie is set in the US unlike the book. I’m unable to remember whether the two – that difference apart – resemble each other closely or not. It’ll be interesting to check.

Vertigo has recently been republished by Pushkin Vertigo Press. Their website is here. A recent blog post highlighted their recent launch and mission statement. Here.

I received a copy of this from them.



14 comments:

  1. Ooh interesting. I think the fact that the film Vertigo was based on a book is one that I keep re-learning and instantly forgetting. It's a good film, though not one of my absolute favourites, and the book sounds as though it's worth a punt...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never knew it was a book when I watched the film and I only realised I had seen the film at about the mid-point of the book, even though I couldn't have watched it longer than 3 years ago......my memory is obviously fairly hopeless.
      Even then I couldn't remember the outcome (which might be slightly different, over the two?)....

      Delete
  2. Thanks for reminding me of this one, Col. It is a fine story that I think has stood the test of tme. I have to admit to a soft spot for the film, too, as I'm a Hitchcock fan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did enjoy this one .......and I have a Hitchcock DVD collection that I dip into occasionally - happy days!

      Delete
  3. Col, I had no idea (not surprising!) that VERTIGO was based on a book. Although I have seen the film, I'm tempted to read the book. This is news, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was unaware of this also until recently. I enjoyed this a lot more than I expected to which was a pleasant bonus.

      Delete
  4. So happy to see you like this one. I have it as well. So, looking forward to it. How is everything? P.S. I saw the movie version of this book sometime ago. Plan to watch it and compare the two if I have time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Keishon - all good thanks. I'm interested in re-watching the film to see the differences, but I'm full of good intentions so probably won't! :-) Hope your mini slump is over and you're back enjoying the reading.

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Col. Mini-slump plus little time to read isn't a great combination but it's what I've been dealing with of late. I'm reading another Patricia Melo. You need to see if you have In Praise of Lies in your inventory. Worth seeking out if you haven't a copy. My used copy says $1.00 on it.

      Delete
    3. No, I don't believe I bought that one. I'll look it up and probably add it to the list, or wait until your review comes and see what the final verdict is?

      Delete
    4. I'm at the halfway mark and hope to finish it today. It's 181 pages long. I'm sure you would have finished it in one day. As for me, I'm too distracted. She is an author I recommend to you personally.

      Delete
    5. I wish.... I keep getting distracted now and I think the second half of the month has seen me only complete 3 books. I've added the title to my Amazon wish-list!

      Delete
  5. I definitely want to read this some day, Col. Especially since you liked it so much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you would enjoy it Tracy. I need to re-watch the film!

      Delete